Archive for May, 2010

My daily readings 05/31/2010

May 31, 2010
  • tags: no_tag

  • tags: Motivation

  • tags: Time, productivity

  • tags: productivity, time

  • tags: ideas

  • tags: no_tag

    • San Francisco is crawling with financial retirees who have degrees, yet produce nothing. Most innovation in the Bay Area occurs in the suburbs, such as silicon valley, Berkeley, and Emeryville.
  • tags: Marketing

  • tags: Product, design

  • tags: iPad, Safari

  • tags: Ebook, Reading

  • tags: Kindle, highlight

  • tags: no_tag

    • 我面前的他是一个妄想症患者,他认为自己是一部书的主角,同时也是作者。病史4年多了,3年前被关进医院。药物似乎对他无效,家人——他老婆都快放弃了。
    • 那次谈话就这么结束了。之后我又去过两次,他不再对我说这些,转而山南海北的闲聊。不过那以后没多久,听说他有所好转,半年多后,出院观察了。出院那天我正好没事儿就去了,他跟他的主治医生和家人朋友谈笑风生,没怎么理我。临走时,他漫不经心的走到我身边,低声快速的说:“还记得第一次那张桌子吗?去看看桌子背面。”说完狡猾的笑了下,没再理我。

      费了好大劲我才找到我和他第一次会面的那张桌子。我趴下去看桌子底下,上面有很多指甲的划痕,依稀能辨认出歪歪斜斜的几个字。

      那是他和我第一次见面的日期,以及一句话:半年后离开。

      过后很久,我眼前都会浮现出他最后那狡猾的笑容。

    • 他:“你可以想象的出来,跨越时间的看,我们是一个长长的虫子怪物,从床上延伸到大街上,延伸到学校,延伸到公司,延伸到商场,延伸到好多地方。因为我们的动作在每个时间段都是不同的,所以跨越时间来看,我们都是一条条虫子。从某一个时间段开始,到某一个时间段结束。”
      我和量子物理教授都愣愣的听着他说。
    • 我努力镇定下来强调调查的事实:“你的母亲、所有的亲戚、邻居,都异口同声的说你哥哥在你出生2年前就夭折了。你怎么解释这件事儿?”
    • “她”那不存在的哥哥,就是“她”的多重人格。
    • 他舔了舔嘴唇继续说:“我给你讲个真实版《三只小猪》的故事吧:三 只小猪住在一栋很大的宫殿里,开始的生活很快乐,大家各自做各自擅长的事情,有一天其中的两只小猪发现一个可怕的怪物进来了。于是那两只小猪一起和怪物搏 斗,但是怪物太强大了,一只小猪死掉了。在死前,他告诉参加搏斗的兄弟,希望他能打败怪物,保护最小的那只小猪。此时最小的那只小猪还不知道怪物的存在。 于是没有战死的这只小猪利用宫殿的复杂和怪物周旋,同时还要保护最小的那只,甚至依旧隐瞒着怪物的存在。这样过去了还就。但是,他太弱了,根本不可能战胜 怪物。而怪物一天天的越来越强大,以至于他一切工作都不能再做了,专心的在和怪物周旋。有一天,怪物占据了宫殿最重要的一个房间,虽然最后终于被引出去 了,但是那个重要的房间还是遭到了严重的破坏。宫殿出了问题,事情再也藏不住了。但是最小的那只小猪很天真,不懂到底是怎么了,于是肩负嘱托的那只小猪撒 谎说宫殿在维修,就快没事儿了。他还在尽可能的保护着她,并且经常会去利用很短的一点儿时间去看望、安慰最小的那只小猪,不让她知道残酷的真相……这不是 一个喜剧……终于怪物还是发现了最小的那只小猪,并且杀死了她……最后那只、也是唯一的那只小猪发誓不惜一切代价复仇,他决定要烧毁这座宫殿,和怪物同归于尽…………这就是《三只小猪》真正的故事。”
    • 大约两年后一个学医的朋友告诉我一个生物器官:鼻犁器(费尔蒙嗅器,vomeronasal organ)很多动物身上都有这个器官。那是一个特殊的感知器官,动物可以通过鼻犁器收集飘散在空气中的残留化学物质,从而判断对方的性别、威胁与否,甚 至可以用来猎物追踪、预知地震。这就是人们常说很多动物拥有的“第六感”。人类虽然还存在这个器官,但都已经高度退化。我当时立刻想到了她的自我描述:鼹 鼠——嗅觉远远强于视觉。也许她的鼻犁器特别发达吧?当然那是我瞎猜的。不过,说句无责任的感慨:有时候眼睛看到的,还真不一定就是真实的
  • tags: AppStore, iPhone

    • This is, of course, silly. The App Store does streamline many things, but not the fundamental tasks of building a successful business: finding a need, fulfilling it, and reaching customers who want to buy the product. It is not a silver bullet.
    • For indie Mac developers like me, it can be a pretty big deal to get in Macworld magazine or have Daring Fireball mention the app or win an Apple Design Award.
    • But compared to most people, the customers who would actually be reached by any of these things are, well, kind of geeky. I mean, even the people who would be reached by the second-order effects of such exposure are still up there on the geek scale.
    • I’ll repeat that: Regular people. Using third-party apps. Not shrinkwrapped software packages from major publishers. Just apps from indie developers. That they downloaded. And paid for. And sometimes even keep up with.

      If this doesn’t shock you every time you see it, you haven’t been paying attention. Average people are, with absolute confidence, doing something that only dorks like me did five years ago.

    • It’s not about using nice icons or having good user interface guidelines — it goes much deeper. At its core, every aspect of the iPhone user experience is carefully crafted around the way we develop emotional relationships with inanimate objects.

      It sounds silly and pretentious, but it’s a real factor! Donald Norman has written and spoken a lot about this topic. Humans are emotional beings, and good human-computer interfaces take this into account.

    • As a result of all this, when you touch the phone, you’re not touching the computer, you’re touching the software. Again, pretentious-sounding, but true!
    • And this isn’t because of how easy it is to install apps, but how easy it is to remove them.

      Somehow, the iPhone is discoverable, knowable, and manageable, in a way that desktop computers (or even other smartphones) never were. The end result is that when people are no longer afraid of their tools, they can finally really use them. They can experiment and test the limits. You know, without being the kind of dorks who read Macworld.

    • Developers may lament the “hit based” nature of App Store apps, comparing it to a Top 40 chart (I’m pretty sure I’ve gotten reports from Apple that referred to my apps as “albums”). But it’s apt — just look in your iTunes sidebar. It practically seems like apps are on the same footing with music and movies and TV shows.

      But this much is clear: regular people actually get the concept of apps, and they’re willing to pay for them. For this reason alone, it’s a great time to be a developer.

    • I prefer good software over open software any day, and I’m of the opinion that social good is maximized by the ebb and flow of free and proprietary systems. And that every piece of software has a tipping point at which it is best made open.

      But even if you disagree, the struggle that the free software movement is fighting isn’t made harder because people don’t understand free software. It’s because people don’t understand software.

      Period

      Period.

  • tags: Annotation, PDF, iPad

    • There is a ‘no comment’ on a very convenient application syncing
      the desktop with an iPad application functionality( for the express
      purpose of removing 5lbs of journal printouts in my backpack).

      Is there, or will there be an API for enterprising users who
      want to home brew an application that syncs with Sente? I’m a CS
      major, and since iPad + Sente = Happy, I am desperate enough to
      write some crude personal app.

  • tags: reference, academic, bibliography, mac, PDF, annotation

  • tags: PDF, Annotation, iPad

    • Hey Guys, We just updated iAnnotate!

      Here’s a quick run through of a few changes:
      - A redesigned and streamlined interface
      - You can receive, modify and send annotated docs through email!
      - Transfer PDFs via iTunes USB
      - Download any PDF link with the integrated web browser
      - Share files with other apps.
      - A redesigned document finder now includes favorites, tag search, new/recent documents, and more.
      - Text annotation summaries are available to read and share.
      - Two finger scroll allows lets you scroll while editing
      - Many other minor interface improvements and bug fixes based on excellent user feedback!

      We’d love to know what you think, and we’re super attentive to our forums if you have any questions at all.

  • tags: Kindle, idea

    • As the Kindle has become a bigger and bigger part of my life, much of my reading time has shifted from RSS-based sources to content on my Kindle, but I’m really curious how much time, how many words, at what times of day, etc I’m consuming all this new content. I think providing stats would also encourage people to read more, and highlight to them how the Kindle has changed their habits.
  • tags: Kindle

    • Kindle Apps could make the Kindle more useful

      At the same time apps that help with the reading process would really, really help users. Basic things like wishlists and bookshelves and perhaps a thesaurus and perhaps an app that remembers a list of new words (Note: this can’t be done from within a book – you would have to go to the app and note the word).

      At the moment there is no way (at least to my knowledge) for an app to play sounds (using the KDK APIs) while reading – However, down the line, an ambient noise app or a better music player would definitely add to the reading process.

    • I read about all the current and future ereaders, the iPad, etc. – and all I can think about is how much I love my Kindle. With the exception of folders or some way to organize books, there’s not a thing I would change. Like the previous poster, I never access Wikipedia or the Kindle Store from my Kindle, although I do highlight and make some notes. And I order books from my laptop. So to me, Kindle’s great strength is being a dedicated ereader that uses eink. I would hope that any future apps would be to improve the quality of our reading experience.
    • From looking at the publicly available documentation of their development kit (I am not a participant of the beta testing) it seems there is no way of developing applications or tools that somehow integrate with existing features of the device. For example one could think of an application that uses information about the dictionary lookups performed when reading a book in a foreign language, and then allowing to schedule repetitions of the words helping to memorize them. Apparently there is no easy way to do it.

      As a user I am probably more interested in Amazon further developing the so called experimental features: the web browser and the music player (with decent UI).

  • tags: Kindle

    • The new features fall into two categories: social, and not-stupid. The social features will let you share a passage via either Facebook or Twitter, and adds a new function called Popular Highlights, which lets you “See what the Kindle community thinks are the most interesting passages in the books you’re reading.” These seem to spoil the very reason I use the Kindle to read: lack of distraction. When I read on my iPod I’m all, like, ADD? The Kindle has until now been much more isolated and book-like.
    • heres hoping AMZN exposes annontations via API
    • If you already have a thousand books on there as some do, yah, it’d be a bit of a pain, but it’s mainly a flick on a highlighted highlighted book on the home page, to add it in to a Collection or into a few collections.

      It’d be better to be able to select a few and then, in one, click get all those into one Collection. So far, no other ereader makes this possible to do within the reader device itself so I suppose it’s not too easy to program (especially when the server is is often scanning for last page read and annotations to be backed up (if you don’t disable the latter feature).

      I had tagged my books, in the past, with keywords prefaced by ‘x’ when I wanted to find things (via the old Add-Note feature) so this will be a lot better :-)

      I didn’t expect them to do something that would give this much flexibility.

      Re the shared highlighting of books info, I’ve always liked a feature they don’t advertise – and that’s the private password-protected webpage you get, listing all your books and showing all your highlights and annotations for each book, with all annotations on any individual book shown on a scrolling page, which is very useful. The new update now includes info on what others thought to highlight in the book.

      Me? I think I’d turn that off. Not interested in knowing! The marketers thought that one up.

      But here’s what the private Amazon webpage of annotations looks like. I made a gif of a shorter list. That’s at http://bit.ly/kwebnotesample

      Hope we get our update sooner than later.

  • tags: Kindle, App

  • tags: Kindle, highlight

  • tags: Kindle, highlight

  • tags: Kindle, highlight

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/30/2010

May 30, 2010
  • Drag and Drop feature for HTML5

    tags: HTML5

    • Since its launch in 2005, Box.net has steadily been growing its cloud-based content management system, and has now accumulated more than 4 million users, with hundreds of thousands of businesses using the application. And the startup is seeing top line growth, with a 500% rise in revenue from 2008 to 2009, and a record first quarter – up 300% from Q1 2009 – thanks to deals with the Oprah Winfrey Network, Volvo, and Nokia Siemens are using Box.net (Box declined to give us exact revenue numbers). And the startup just raised $15 million in funding.

      Levie seems pretty passionate about the potential influence of HTML5 on the enterprise, even saying that “HTML5 will be the death of desktop software.” Box plans to add HTML5-enabled functions like pausing/resuming uploads, offline caching, and multiple file select in the near future.

  • tags: no_tag

    • Imagine…now, as a publisher, I have 200 ‘followers’ whose sole interest is in seeing the links/stories that I publish. Jason Fried talks about building an audience. So far, there is no other tool that ‘aggregates’ all your content and pushes it directly to an audience like digg v4 is suggested to do.
    • The mere fact that I can have one place, that streamlines all of the links published by people I am interested in hearing from + links they found interesting, is absolutely game-changing (in my opinion).Ofcourse, it all comes down execution, but based on what I am seeing, I think I see Kevin back in his original form. Quite contrary to your assertion about pandering to his VCs, I don’t see any evidence of driving revenues. I see mainly product development. I see small UI elements that seem to enhance the link discovery process. I see giving value to small-time publishers and further ‘democratization’ of news.
    • We’re certainly in accord about there being a value neither fb nor twitter are completely providing. I just see the simplest explanation for a premier startup that far (seriesC) into funding to implent trendy features to benefit publishers (not readers) to be the result of VC pressure. If reddit is any indication, the majority of visitors to digg don’t even login, far more don’t comment, and far more don’t submit.

      For this model to really work, I suspect it’d require a lot more participation on the part of diggers, else tyoud just have a lot of publishers automatically spamming links at one another.

    • It doesn’t matter what something was designed to do, it’s much more important how it is used.

      Standalone RSS readers are a fairly primitive form of RSS feed consumption imo.

      The problem with Digg has long been that it reflects what is mainstream to a non-mainstream group. This, Digg v4, doesn’t change that, but it is a step in the right direction. I agree with Alexis’ questioning though of the form it takes & the reactions “Too little, too late.”

  • tags: no_tag

    • I love nothing more than shouting my opinion on things, and I’ve been particularly harsh on Rose and Digg over the last several months. But opinions are one thing. Rewriting history is another.
    • Reddit, a site for discovering and sharing new things, was launched in mid-2005, more than six months after Digg. There were very few differences between Reddit and Digg then, and they haven’t diverged all that much since then, either. Both sites allow users to vote on submitted stories/links, and the most popular stories are on the home page. Reddit ripped off the core Digg idea when it launched. Which is totally fine in my opinion, since the Internet has evolved in this way from the beginning. You take someone else’s ideas and you try to improve on them.
    • Paul Carr put this best when we were discussing this post internally on Yammer: “So at best they did zero research before they launched Reddit into a space that kinda relies on the founders knowing where to find cool new stuff online.”
    • Kevin returned to a full time role at Digg earlier this year and clearly wants to prove that he can bring this company back to life. He’s excited about Digg, clearly. He may succeed. He may fail. But at least he’s in the arena and fighting valiantly.
    • It will be tough for Digg to recoup $40M of funding. Reddit had less than $1M of funding, was able to sell out at several times that, and the founders could move on with their lives.
    • Michael, maybe I’m biased as an avid reddit user, but for one Alexis is no longer connected with reddit in any official capacity as far as I know, secondly I’m pretty sure he doesn’t mean “You suck for copying others!” he means “You’re copying popular features from elsewhere that have no real use on your site”. Imagine if Techcrunch decided to copy twitter and implement a followers feature… something completely worthless and out of place, I’m sure you’d be criticized for that.

      Again, maybe I’m blind to the hypocrisy of Alexis, but it seems he’s saying that Digg is wrong for copying something *because* it’s out of place, not because copying is wrong: afterall, the internet thrives on reimplementation of others ideas, everyone knows this.

      As a side note, Digg was not an original idea, many sites for sharing links existed before it, many have been created since. It’s all about implementation, if I create a blog about “tech” today am I copying Techcrunch?

    • Just some history for you. Kevin Rose started Digg in December of 2004, but he was actively employed by G4 until May of 2005 and Digg as a site didn’t gain much popularity until Kevin started working at it full time. I joined Digg in April of 2005, but only after seeing a segment on G4 about it that Kevin did. It is totally believable that the founders of Reddit had never heard of Digg since it gained popularity after Reddit was created. Dismissing Reddit as a Digg clone may have been accurate in 2005, but the sites diverged and the focus of the communities changed. Digg became rife with power users and the front page became their playground as politics amongst users heated up. Reddit maintained a balanced approach to how stories were submitted and advanced, and have fulfilled the promise of Digg better than the current product that Digg offers. Reddit took the idea that Kevin had and indeed delivered on it instead of floundering in the pocket of a MrBabyman.
  • tags: money

    • Although today’s poster only asked, “What do I do with my money?”, there’s a second, related question that’s also very important, “What do I do with my life?” In both cases, I think the right answer is, “start slow, and avoid making any big decisions now”, though as always, there are exceptions.
    • The money question is the easier of the two to answer: First, don’t lose the money!
    • Read what Warren Buffett has to say about financial helpers. Spend a few years getting recommendations and talking to various advisors before deciding (intermittently, not full-time, of course). Avoid hiring this guy. Meanwhile, put your money in a very safe fixed-income investment, such as short-term CDs. You can circumvent the FDIC insurance limit by having the money spread accross multiple banks (think of it as “RAID for money”) — see CDARS for more info. Don’t rush to invest it in the stock market — that’s risky and you could easily lose half of your money in a matter of months. Avoid long-term or illiquid investments, though it’s fine to put a few percent into random things such as startups, but understand that you’ll probably lose that money, so consider it an educational expense.
    • First, it’s important to understand that once you have the basics, happiness comes primarily from healthy social connections and a sense of purpose. If you quit your job and move to a new city where you don’t know anyone or have a clear purpose, there’s a good chance that you’ll end up depressed or even suicidal. So unless your current life is very broken, don’t do that. Take it slow.
    • Many people with jobs have a fantasy about all the amazing things they would do if they didn’t need to work. In reality, if they had the drive and commitment to do actually do those things, they wouldn’t let a job get in the way.
    • Again, don’t make any drastic changes unless you really need to. Spend time building up new activities, interests, and social connections, especially ones that will give your life a sense of purpose.
    • True freedom comes from the inside anyway — we’re all still slaves to the larger system. (while searching for a story to illustrate this point, I ended up on Epictetus’s Wikipedia page — he seems to have had it about right, so I’ll go with that, though The Matrix is also entertaining)
    • Explore the opportunity. Do something remarkable. Go for a walk in the park. Appreciate the trees.
  • tags: Sync

  • tags: Product, design

  • How to use money

    tags: no_tag

  • tags: designer

    • The problem is that UX requires business knowledge, psychology, design, and code all working in concert with each other. The education system does not treat people to think holistically. It’s why designers, coders and biz dev all hate each other. The problem is that all innovation happens at the nexus of these disciplines. Entrepreneurs often drop out out of school because of this.

      So the answer: They don’t exist in mass because they are all self-trained. You will find them in pockets working in various industries and obviously in startups but it’s all quite haphazard.

      My recommendation:

      1) Learn as much as you can yourself. Wireframe some stuff in plain HTML/JS and show people the clickable design and refine from there. Iterate, iterate. Make yourself care.

      2) Read Amy Hoy. Most of what she writes is “aha!” inducing.

    • Example: I interviewed people for a “web artist” position recently. I’d expect someone in that position to have good traditional layout, composition, sketching, drawing, coloring (whether painting or markers or Photoshop) skills, understanding of and practice using grids, typography, font selection, be able to describe their design process, how to run a critique, how to take a critique, plus a basic understanding of not just HTML, but CSS, and that they keep up on things like CSS animations and such. That’s all on top of other things like demonstrated ability to work as part of a large team (jacks of all trades are immediately suspect) and being able to sit for long periods.
    • The problem is that to find a truly good ux developer, you have to find someone that is not only artisticly inspired, but also someone who is grounded in statistics and testing / scientific method. It is a rare breed and the market is flooded with hacks. Start by looking for someone who has a background in human factors and then look at their portfolio. It’s not a magic bullet but it will weed out a good deal of hacks.
  • tags: development

  • tags: development

  • tags: leadership, management

  • tags: developer

    • this is not true. if a team is “hiring” you can transfer in, but the popular ones are full up, and getting in is very competitive. plus many teams are only in a particular office and if are not willing to move to it, then you are out of luck.

      that said, transfers are supported by management and there’s a nice internal web app for browsing which teams have reqs and for requesting a transfer.

    • I think the correct title would have been – “Why I won’t work at Microsoft, again.”.

      I don’t think it’s a valid argument against Google without having any data-points. I’ve seen many Startups also don’t finish their features/products and throw away when they realize this is not the right thing to do.

      Overall, don’t generalize too much. Experiences are different for different people at different places.

    • That’s not surprising, given the person running Bing is Qi Lu. There’s a reason they brought in an outsider: they just couldn’t afford to screw this attempt up.

      I’ve had the enormous privilege of working in his organization at Yahoo (I still have no idea how I was able to fool my interview panel into hiring me straight out of college and into that group).

      That experience gave me an extremely highly bar in terms of choosing engineering organizations to work for. There’s only a couple of non-startup companies I am willing to work at after this experience: most everyone else – including non-search parts of Yahoo – just does not get how to run an online service and are unwilling to listen to a young punk like me :-)

    • Damn, I really, really agree with this:

        I know that while it’s important to write quality software,
        it’s equally important to just fucking finish it.
    • I believe because the publicly available reports of their interview process don’t seem to emphasize “getting stuff done” as much as she prefers, but instead emphasize other attributes. She believes that if it’s not emphasized in the interview process, it’s likely to be underemphasized in the organization as a whole. Since she believes that attribute to be more important than its proportion of apparent emphasis, the probability of being dissatisfied with her work environment is too high for her tastes. That’s how I read it anyway.
    • I would say that interviewing for engineering knowledge (coding, algorithms, software engineering) is pretty straight forward, but interviewing to figure out if a candiate can get ‘real’ work done is very difficult.

      I don’t know of any magic way of testing for that. There are some good signals, of course, such as:

      1) pre-interview open source reputation and release.
      2) References from people you trust and respect.
      3) Publications with significant content written by the candidate.

      But I’ve seen each of these fail, even in combination, in predicting the ability to execute. That said, it’s better than nothing.

      (disclaimer, I work for Google, and am also waiting for the part about Google in the OP)

  • tags: iPad, future, mobile

    • Rose asked Doerr for his thoughts about what’s coming next. Doerr says that’s we’re on the third great wave of innovation. The first was the microchip/PC in the 80s. The second was the Internet in the 90s. And now we’re entering a wave of social, mobile, and new commerce, Doerr says.
    • Doerr (who invested in Apple) clearly loves this device. He had one on stage with him and kept picking it up over and over again throughout the Internet. He says it will change the way we interact with everyday things such as television. And it will charge health care. But maybe most importantly, it will change education, he says.
    • John Doerr: Great question. I think we’re on the verge of a third great wave of innovation. The first was the microchip and the PC in the early 80s. The second wave was 1995: the Internet. Marc Andresseen brought Netscape Navigator to the world. Then Amazon came. Then in 1999 we saw the 15th search engine called “Google.”

      This third wave is social, mobile, new commerce. We don’t have a name for it yet. We could be on the verge of reinventing the web. It’s people, it’s places, it’s relationships. It’s exciting.

    • CR: In the first hour with the iPhone and app, you were in right? You knew.

      JD: I did. These smartphones change everything. They’re always connected, always on. It’s a powerful new platform. 85 million iPhones and iPod touches – we’re there. And now we have the iPad. It took just 28 days to sell a million of them. It’s not a big iPod. It’s a new paradigm. Imagine 10 years forward.

    • CR: Go ahead take 10 years forward. Steve Jobs told you “this is the best work of my life.” Why does he think that?
      JD: It’s not a computer. You don’t need files. You don’t need mice. It’s magic, what you see is what you touch. I don’t want to call it a computer. It’s a magical surface.
    • CR: What does Mark Pincus and others like Zuckerberg have in common with some of the greats?

      JD: They were nerds. They had no social life whatsoever. They have a love affair with their companies. They were missionaries not mercenaries.

    • JD: We invested in Zynga 20 months ago, and it’s the fastest growing venture we’ve ever had. The people there are extraordinary. They can monetize these new social networks. Advertising is one part, but it’s more than that. 2% will pay for virtual goods. They also raised $3.6 million for Haiti in just a few days. It’s powerful stuff.
    • JD: I haven’t talked about new immersive relationship between you and the medium. Again, I’m not talking about computers. It’s like the iPad. This is a fluid experience. New ways of interacting, things from Apple, Cooliris, there are others. These will improve. We’ll look back at these devices today as if it’s the stone age.

      I’m excited about what the iPad can do with healthcare. The government is spending $20 billion on this. We need this information in the cloud. Every doctor and nurse needs an iPad.

  • Worth reading for every product manager, developer and designer.

    tags: Product, design

  • tags: startup, relationship

  • The result is knowing little about a lot of different things. While the latter graph may still Internet users, the large gaps should be filled instead by many little bars.

    tags: no_tag

    • My personal opinion is that reading newspaper editorials daily and weekend reading of Economist (what the author calls pre-Internet habit) is more likely to offer analytical depth than browsing tens of blog sites and following up-to-the-minute trends on Twitter. IMHO, Internet has more breadth but less depth… I would want my young kid to follow the newspaper+Economist habit than bothering about hundreds of ever-changing news stories on Twitter and blogs.
  • tags: Startup

      • Creating a new market is difficult and risky.
      • Changing people’s working habits is hard.
      • Social factors can make or break a product. The end-users didn’t see anything in it for them.
      • If the end-users don’t like a product, they will find a way not to use it, even if their bosses appear to be enthusiastic about it.
      • Talk is cheap. Lots of people telling you how great your product is doesn’t mean much. You only really find out if your product is commercially viable when you start asking people to buy it.
    • A small number of copies were sold. No one is actively using it at present. Once I realised that it wasn’t a complete product and that additional development was required I moved on to other product ideas. I had basically run out of enthusiasm for the product.
      • I am not an accountant.
      • I have never run a cleaning company.
  • tags: UI, UE

    • “But the place for such experimentation is in the lab.”

      That’s a silly, elitist statement. No matter how much testing you do in the lab, the ultimate test is in the hands of end users. Lots of dumb WIMP UI ideas, like modal dialogs, MDI windows, and nested menu hierarchies, survived the labs at Xerox, Apple, and Microsoft, but fell out of favor over years of real user experience. On the other side of the coin, lots of now-popular desktop and web UI elements were conceived by run-of-the-mill developers far from any research campus. As the new-car smell wears off touch devices, plenty of touch UI conventions will get drop-tested in the wild, the stupid ones will get discarded, and the good ones will get copied by everyone and become taken for granted. This will happen far faster in the cutthroat app marketplace, under the eyes of millions of customers, than in any HCI lab.

  • tags: startup

    • Awesome article. You hear a lot about getting feedback early being a good idea, but this really highlights it.
    • It’s actually very simple. Hard to do but simple. There is no sophisticated insight or knowledge or process you need to know. It’s simple but hard.

      Suppose you have an idea for some software for travel agents. Before opening an idea or writing a single line of html you go to the phone book and find the number of a travel agent. You call them and say :

      “Hi can I speak to the manager please. Hi there, my name is Sam and I have an idea for a computer software tool that might be useful for Travel agents, I’m not selling anything but would you have 15 minutes available for me to talk to you and get your feedback ?”

      Do that 20 times. Talk to 10 different people. List any repeated phrases, objections or suggestions. Ask each of them “Do you think this would be useful to other travel agents ?”.

      Now if you have the guts to do this very simple but difficult thing enough times that you actually talk to 10 different potential users you will know whether there is a market and if there is you will already have real beta testers lined up.

      People may want to pick holes in this “what about…” “what if…”. Yeah, you can analyse on the internet all you want but the fact remains, if you do this the chances of you building something people will buy goes up dramatically.

      And the reason people don’t do this is almost always fear.

      (note: I was the Sam Howley in the article)

  • tags: Minimalism

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/29/2010

May 29, 2010
  • tags: UI, UE, Design

  • tags: no_tag

    • I don’t understand the reasoning behind this move. Sure, I get that it’s ‘cool’- Digg just has Twitter/Facebook/etc envy.

      Digg used to be a place for finding crowd sourced news (or, more recently, lolcats). Now, it will be merely yet another way to share links with your friends. I get that enough on other sites (Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Buzz, etc). In order to get any value, you will need to be following a large number of diverse and interesting people who post cool and relevant links. Prior to the changes, you merely had to type in digg.com in order to see what the “world” found interesting.

      Digg had a brilliant concept- make the users the editors. When it started, it was great- it had relevant and timely tech and political news. As it grew, they found themselves victims of catering to the lowest common denominator (which equates to funny pictures, it seems). Rather than use v4 to figure out a way to change this (maybe similar to Reddits’ subreddits?), they created a Digg-styled Facebook clone.

      Yes, Top News is still there. However, it’s been relegated to a tab.

      I wish Digg the best, however I don’t see myself using it if I need to follow and share in order to derive value from the site. It’s unfortunately- Digg has always been a quality site (in terms of software and vision, if not content).

    • Re: 2. Two social sites are clear winners: Facebook and Twitter. Delicious initially had strong adoption, hence they were acquired, but it’s been downhill since then. Google Buzz can be considered a failure; Google forced their social graph upon users and they weren’t happy.

      For the two successful sharing sites out there, hundreds are struggling (Digg included) or dead.

      In regards to the rest of your points, there’s no telling how the product will exactly play out until we have access to play with it for ourselves.

    • It’s rather telling that they’re marketing Digg as a way to get traffic. Yes, it’s good for that that, but that’s not what it’s for. It’s (well, used to be) for finding interesting news, articles, links, etc. Getting more people to post their own blogspam probably won’t help the site much. And for the actual users, I think it’d be a little disheartening to see Rose trying to appeal to publishers rather than the community.
    • Hmm, so the idea is basically a mashup of current Digg, plus some ideas from Twitter and Delicious
  • tags: no_tag

    • Uhh…what? These are features that seem kindof obvious to me…I think they’re awesome. In fact, this is really similar to something that I used to do on my website over a year ago (we stopped doing it because there weren’t enough users to make it feasible at that time…some of the ideas still exist though).

      Alexis, one of the problems with reddit, at least right now, is that there are just too many freaking people. I don’t care about the majority of the users on the site. If there was a way to see reddit as it was 5 years ago when it was you and 10 other people, that would be great, and I think that is what the move digg has made here is trying to accomplish.

    • People weren’t making “friends” on digg for much else than spreading their content, so I suspect most of the networks in place aren’t adding much value to me as a reader. V4 makes the process all the more transparent – publishers plugging in RSS feeds that autodigg each post is a far cry from a reader powered frontpage. And to be fair, of those first 10 redditors you miss, over half of them were me ;)

      There’s still a void between random links my facebook friends like and random links tweeters (?) I follow like that solves the signal/noise problem. Someone will fill it – I’d love for it to be newslily. Just promise you’ll gank from Steve’s commenting system, it really is top notch (in my biased opinion).

    • My only issue with this is that it assumes my friends use Digg too, and they don’t. Kevin speaks a little bit about “tastemakers” (how do I find them? Why do I trust them?) and “publishers” (which sounds a lot like RSS spam… right to you in Digg).

      I hope there is a setting for Top News to be the default, and maybe some way of matching people who you are compatible with Digging to set them as your Tastemakers, allowing a transition away from Top News to something more personalized.

    • Digg has already shopped itself around to all the big buyers and they passed (explicitly or not). This move is an attempt by Digg to position themselves as a potential rival to Twitter and/or Facebook. Now all they need is one big dumb company that buys into that illusion.
    • I wish them luck in getting bought out. Seems like Digg would be a good fit for Yahoo, considering their new content-only direction.
    • What? I don’t understand what the big problem with some HN users and ‘linkbait’.

      Who cares? It’s called journalism. In order to catch attention, the headline has to be attention grabbing.

      This post was soo timely for HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1384994

      If the article was garbage, then yes I would agree with you. But who cares if he manipulates the headline to get attention.

      The next time you write a blog post, or anything, that doesn’t have an attention grabbing headline and gets a ton of traffic…please let us know.

      reply

  • tags: no_tag

    • At Inventables his findings were not so surprising. We haven’t used those 3 words before but we’ve set up our company to benefit from this kind of approach for many years. In 2002 when we were just starting out and had very little money we established an $1200 exploration budget for every employee. The only rule surrounding the budget was the money was earmarked for exploration. There were no approvals required, no expectations of ROI, no timeframes. Each employee was given that money, trust, and autonomy to go explore. Companies that apply Dan Pink’s ideas get this kind of approach, where a traditional company finds this frightening.
    • Free Point Project #3: A “You might also like” feature that uses machine learning to get smarter the more our website is used. This feature increased sales leads being sent to vendors by 50%
  • tags: Startup

    • And we got lucky, frankly. We sold to Condé Nast in 2006, which stayed hands off, let the site keep growing, and even encouraged us to open source – the site has grown to over 1/2 million unique visitors a day. And all of that is run by only 4 awesomesauce developers (edit: and one fantastic community manager!); I think the math comes out to 1 dev for every 2 million monthly uniques. 
    • Where have we heard this before: Twitter? Facebook? GoogleBuzz?

      Kevin, you absolutely deserve all the credit for starting the movement — fascinating things happen when online communities can efficiently share content. Whales get silly names and we can expose the tragedies our fellow man endures faster than ever before.

      It’s a damned shame to see digg just re-implementing features from other websites.

    • Could the future really look that much like facebook & twitter? There’s a problem neither site solves: my facebook friends aren’t as diverse as I’d like for me to find the best variety of good content online at any given time and conversely, there’s no great noise filter in the twitterverse (trending topics mostly make my brain hurt).

      And I want to punch myself for saying ‘twitterverse.’

    • What a novel idea you are offering for the VCs to take their hands off and give the power to the founder. This attitude is what differs a kid with an idea from a businessman who takes the idea and makes it profitable. Kevin chose to make money and chose the way of making it through VCs and for a good reason I suppose. He could have hung out and wait for the magical wand of business world to come down from the sky and touch him.

      If you are taking the VCs money, you need to give them back something. Site, in it is infancy and purity, I am sure was not anything like it is today, but at that time it was not making money and I am sure the developers were working for stuffed crust pizza from “the hut”, with the hopes of making it rich one day. Their ship came and they hopped on. Unfortunately, nothing in this life is free. If you want to ride that ship, you need to pay the price by relinquishing control.

      I advise you to grow up as well. Your attitude is not that of a businessman.

  • tags: management, startup

  • tags: management, startup

  • tags: developer

  • tags: People

  • tags: HTML5

  • tags: HTML5

  • tags: UI, UE

  • tags: developer

  • tags: screenshot, web

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/28/2010

May 28, 2010
  • tags: Custome

  • tags: no_tag

    • We use it for our sonos remote, to do crossword puzzles, play games, pull up menus to order in, read techmeme and hacker news, and watch the occasional youtube video. It’s replaced our kitchen computer on our kitchen countertop. It’s become a member of our family. And when visitors come over, they love to use it. It’s great at a party.

      Our iPhones, Androids, and Blackberries are our personal devices. We wear them and they are with us everywhere. Our iPad is our family computer in way that the kitchen macbook never was.

    • So I’ve changed my mind about the iPad and tablet computers. In my initial review, I focused on capabilities. And tablets are stuck between the power and utility of the notebook and the size and features of a smartphone. But they also create a middle place in terms of usability. And that is what I missed in my first day with the iPad. It feels less like a computer than any computing device I’ve owned. It’s easy on me in a way that the other devices are not. So I’m now convinced that tablets will have an important place in our homes and our lives.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/27/2010

May 27, 2010

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/26/2010

May 26, 2010

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/25/2010

May 25, 2010
  • tags: startup

  • tags: no_tag

    • “Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.” -Steve Jobs
  • tags: no_tag

    • The three mechanisms most important to building such a platform are architecting for extensibility, providing a robust API to the platform’s functionality, and ensuring the long-term health and value of the user experience.
    • Our responsibilities extend from there. Twitter is responsible for the health, reliability, and scale of the network, Twitter-branded endpoints (SMS, a twitter client on the web and other most popular platforms, Twitter-branded widgets), a consistent user experience, and a sustaining revenue model for the platform. We will provide the best possible experience for each of these.
    • For this reason, aside from Promoted Tweets, we will not allow any third party to inject paid tweets into a timeline on any service that leverages the Twitter API. We are updating our Terms of Service to articulate clearly what we mean by this statement, and we encourage you to read the updated API Terms of Service to be released shortly.
    • Secondly, the basis for building a lasting advertising network that benefits users should be innovation, not near-term monetization. Twitter is uniquely dependent on and responsible for the long-term health and value of the platform. Accordingly, a necessary focus of Promoted Tweets is to explore ways to create value for our users. Third party ad networks may be optimized for near-term monetization at the expense of innovating or creating the best user experience. We believe it is our responsibility to encourage creative product development and to curb practices that compromise innovation.
    • 2. We believe there are opportunities to sell ads, build vertical applications, provide breakthrough analytics, and more. Companies are selling real-time display ads or other kinds of mobile ads around the timelines on many Twitter clients, and we derive no explicit value from those ads. That’s fine. We imagine there will be all sorts of other third-party monetization engines that crop up in the vicinity of the timeline.
    • Platforms evolve. When Annotations ship, there are going to be many new business opportunities on the Twitter platform in addition to those currently available. We know that companies and entrepreneurs will create things with Annotations that we couldn’t have imagined. Companies will emerge that provide all manner of rich data and meta-data services around and in Tweets. Twitter clients could begin to differentiate on their ability to service different data-rich verticals like Finance or Entertainment. Media companies in the ecosystem can begin to incorporate rich tagging capabilities. Much has been written about the opportunities afforded by Annotations because those that understand the benefits of extensible architectures understand their power and potential.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/24/2010

May 24, 2010

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/23/2010

May 23, 2010
  • tags: startup, product, PM

    • Tip1: Start from Epicenter of the idea, product
      Epicenter is the core and what a product stands for. Stick to/start with what product stands for and only build features that defines you and your business. Build half the products that you want to build, but not half assed product; cutting out what is merely good, only keep the core and the best.
    • Building a product for a new business should be the same way, instead of setting up long term goals, 3 months long feature sets plan, breaking them down to mini-sets, weekly feature-sets-milestone will make you aware of your progress more, bringing more motivation and fuel to keep going strong. This is how I am building mine now.
    • Tip3: Constrain is the resource and Outside money is plan Z
      I love this tip. Never take outside money before you build out the epicenter of your product. Resource constraint is a good thing that will force us to build only the most necessary to launch the core of our product, our business, our service.
  • tags: Startup

  • tags: no_tag

    • 74 percent of the 27 companies are either profitable or have received commitments for outside funding, YC said today. And at least a handful of those rounds were for over $1 million, we’ve been told.
    • Recent acquisitions of companies from the Y Combinator program include reMail and AppJet, both by Google. As to which of the companies YC thinks are the most promising, here’s the list it included in the post: “Airbnb, Bump, Cloudkick, Clustrix, DailyBooth, Disqus, Dropbox, Heroku, Heyzap, Justin.tv, Loopt, Posterous, RethinkDB, Reddit, Scribd, Songkick, Weebly, Wepay, Wufoo, and Xobni.”

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

My daily readings 05/21/2010

May 21, 2010
  • tags: no_tag

    • And if the leader of the organization is anxious, his or her fear pervades the organization. Everything comes from the top in a company. So it is best to have to have a leader who exudes confidence.

      You can certainly have too much confidence. Arrogance and cockiness can be as harmful to a startup as anxiety and fear. A person who is quietly confident makes the best leader.

  • tags: wave, Business

    • This is how http://BraintrustHQ.com works. It also has a simpler user experience focused on making conversations productive and organized.

      reply

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.